GearAtlas
Side by side

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony A7 IV

Real-world comparison — specs, sensor size, autofocus, video, ownership reality. Adjust the workflow lens below to see how each body lands for travel, hybrid, wildlife, or studio use.

Body fit

Visual

Kit cost

Estimated

Verdict

Ranked

Canon EOS R6 Mark II camera official product image

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Full-frame / 670g

$3,149.63
Sony A7 IV camera official product image

Sony A7 IV

Full-frame / 659g

$3,148.26

Workflow lens

Workflow rankingtravel

Sony A7 IV is the stronger fit for travel and everyday carry.

Strong hybrid/video feature set

Deep ecosystem flexibility

Favorable current market signal

Workflow score

1Sony A7 IV78
2Canon EOS R6 Mark II74
Open winning profile

Camera size studio

Relative body dimensions

Front, back and top views are drawn from external dimensions so the size relationship stays proportional.

View

Mode

138mm
98mm

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Front view / 138 x 98mm

138 x 98 x 88mm

131mm
96mm

Sony A7 IV

Front view / 131 x 96mm

131 x 96 x 80mm

Width

Canon EOS R6 Mark II138mm
Sony A7 IV131mm

Height

Canon EOS R6 Mark II98mm
Sony A7 IV96mm

Depth

Canon EOS R6 Mark II88mm
Sony A7 IV80mm

Weight

Canon EOS R6 Mark II670g
Sony A7 IV659g

External dimensions and carry delta

Sony A7 IV is the narrowest (7mm less than Canon EOS R6 Mark II), Sony A7 IV is the shortest (2mm less than Canon EOS R6 Mark II), Sony A7 IV is the thinnest (8mm less than Canon EOS R6 Mark II), and Sony A7 IV is the lightest (11g less than Canon EOS R6 Mark II).

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

138 x 98 x 88mm135cm2 face / 1190cm3 body / 670g

Sony A7 IV

131 x 96 x 80mm126cm2 face / 1006cm3 body / 659g

Class benchmarks

WeightTypical 650g
Canon EOS R6 Mark II: 670gSony A7 IV: 659g
ThicknessTypical 74mm
Canon EOS R6 Mark II: 88mmSony A7 IV: 80mm

Sensor comparison

Sensor size to scale

Canon EOS R6 Mark IIFull-frame36×24mm
×1 crop
Sony A7 IVFull-frame36×24mm
×1 crop

All 2 use Full-frame sensors — sensor size is a wash here.

Decision matrix

Scores tuned for travel

Portability
Canon EOS R6 Mark II54
Sony A7 IV55
Video
Canon EOS R6 Mark II82
Sony A7 IV82
Autofocus
Canon EOS R6 Mark II100
Sony A7 IV72
Ecosystem
Canon EOS R6 Mark II74
Sony A7 IV94
Resale
Canon EOS R6 Mark II80
Sony A7 IV82
Market
Canon EOS R6 Mark II98
Sony A7 IV98
Value
Canon EOS R6 Mark II86
Sony A7 IV89

Highlighted specs

Only specs that change the decision

Burst

40fps electronic

Sensor

33MP full-frame BSI

Autofocus

Dual Pixel CMOS AF II

Video

4K/60p (S35), 7K oversampled

No highlighted counterpart
No highlighted counterpart
No highlighted counterpart
No highlighted counterpart

Community comparison

Owner consensus · not specs

Community comparison appears once owners vote on these products — 6 more votes across the pair will unlock it.

Where to buy

Ready to commit?

Check current pricing and availability from a major retailer. We may earn a commission on purchases through these links — it never changes what we recommend or the price you pay.

Canon

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Brand & model search · Amazon CA

Check current price

Sony

Sony A7 IV

Brand & model search · Amazon CA

Check current price

Affiliate links earn GearAtlas a small commission at no cost to you. How we use affiliate links.

Common questions

Answers from this comparison

Drawn from the products' specs and category facts — same logic the comparison engine uses for its verdict.

Is the Canon EOS R6 Mark II better than the Sony A7 IV?

Neither product is universally better — the right answer depends on what you shoot. Walk the use-case verdicts in the comparison studio above to see which body lines up with your specific work.

Which is better for travel — the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Sony A7 IV?

For travel, the combination of weight, weather sealing, and lens flexibility matters more than headline specs. The carry-envelope module in the comparison above breaks down the practical kit weight of each body with a normal lens attached.